Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Duplicity of the Offense

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

A prosecutor labels two independent offenses a complex crime, but the stipulated acts are separate and neither offense was a necessary means for the other. No other single-punishment law applies, and a timely objection is made. Which is sound?
  1. The prosecutor’s label conclusively creates an Article 48 relationship.
  2. The label does not establish Rule 110’s exception; the actual legal predicates control.
  3. Any shared defendant requires one statutory punishment.
  4. The timely objection automatically proves both offenses.
  5. The court must disregard Article 48’s conditions.

Legal references

  • Rules of Court, Rule 110, Sections 7-15; Rule 116, Section 9; Rule 117, Sections 3(f) and 9; Rule 120, Section 3, as relevant: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_110-127_crim.html
  • Revised Penal Code, Article 48, as amended by Act 4000 (grave or less grave felonies), official consolidated text: https://pcw.gov.ph/act-no-3815-the-revised-penal-code/

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.