Philippine Bar review · Topic

Prejudicial Question

Explore Prejudicial Question in Prosecution of Civil Action (Rule 111) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Which combination states the elements of a prejudicial question under Rule 111 section 7?
  2. Why is mere overlap of facts between a civil and criminal case insufficient?
  3. Once the criminal case is in court for trial, when does Rule 111 section 6 allow the suspension petition based on a pre…
  4. An earlier civil case and a later criminal case share documents, but deciding the civil claim will not determine whethe…
  5. During preliminary investigation before a prosecutor, the respondent invokes a pending prior civil case as presenting a…
  6. Two corporate factions contest a board election in a prior civil case. A director is later charged with grave coercion …
  7. A criminal action is filed in January. In March the accused files a civil action over related documents and seeks autom…
  8. State the elements and purpose of a prejudicial question, distinguishing it from merely overlapping facts.
  9. Explain where and when suspension based on a prejudicial question may be sought under Rule 111 section 6.
  10. A prior corporate-election case is invoked to suspend a later grave-coercion prosecution. Explain the analysis required…
  11. Under Natividad-Florentino, does a pending petition for declaration of nullity automatically suspend a related bigamy c…
  12. In the bigamy setting addressed by Natividad-Florentino, where may the accused substantiate a void-ab-initio marriage d…