Practice question
The court acquits solely on reasonable doubt and expressly finds that the underlying transaction occurred. Must it reject a properly presented civil claim solely because guilt was not proved?
- Yes, civil liability requires imprisonment.
- No; the civil claim must be assessed under its applicable basis and preponderance standard.
- Yes, every acquittal proves the transaction never occurred.
- No; the entire amount demanded is automatically due.
- Yes, unless the accused consents to conviction.
Legal references
- https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_110-127_crim.html — Rule 111 section 2 and Rule 120 section 2: civil liability, nonexistence finding and acquittal judgment contents.
- https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1949/ra_386_1949.html — Civil Code articles 29 and 31: reasonable-doubt acquittal and other sources.
- https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2024/jan2024/gr_246489_2024.html — Spouses Nuez v. Daz, G.R. 246489, January 29, 2024, main opinion: distinct acquittal grounds and civil consequences.
- https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2024/feb2024/gr_255308_2024.html — Paguirigan v. People, G.R. 255308, February 12, 2024, main opinion: reasonable-doubt acquittal with civil reimbursement.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.