Philippine Bar review · Topic
Who May Conduct (RA 10071)
Explore Who May Conduct (RA 10071) in Preliminary Investigation (Rule 112, partly repealed by AM 24-02-09-SC; Department of Justice [DOJ] DC 15 and 28, s…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Under DC15 Section6, which general category is authorized to conduct preliminary investigation in the DOJ-NPS framework? Multiple Choice Easy
- Does a private complainant’s selection alone authorize a private lawyer to act as the public investigating prosecutor? Multiple Choice Easy
- Is the old listing of first-level judges as preliminary investigators a reliable statement of current ordinary DOJ-NPS … Multiple Choice Easy
- A city prosecutor proposes to investigate an ordinary local offense with no territorial connection to that office and n… Multiple Choice Medium
- A state prosecutor handles a case under a valid Secretary of Justice direction within the governing rules. Must the cas… Multiple Choice Medium
- An official insists that DOJ-NPS rules make the DOJ the sole investigator of every offense, eliminating any independent… Multiple Choice Hard
- A private counsel assists a complainant and assembles documents. Counsel then signs a purported final public-prosecutor… Multiple Choice Hard
- Identify the source and limits of authority to conduct a DOJ-NPS preliminary investigation. Essay Medium
- Distinguish prosecutorial investigation from the judge’s judicial functions. Essay Medium
- Why must the investigator check the governing authority rather than assume DC15 displaces all other investigative bodie… Essay Medium
- Under RA10071 Section9(b), may a provincial or city prosecutor receive witness statements under oath in an authorized i… Multiple Choice Easy
- Under RA10071 Section9(b), what process may the prosecutor use to summon a witness to testify under oath? Multiple Choice Easy