Practice question
Go was arraigned over repeated protests concerning the omitted investigation. Did the Court equate that compelled participation with silent acquiescence?
- Yes, any arraignment erases every prior objection.
- No.
- Yes, counsel’s recorded protests were irrelevant.
- Yes, every protest conclusively proves the charge.
- Yes, participation can never be examined in context.
Legal references
- Rules of Court, Rule 113, Sections 2-9, and Rule 114, Section 26, as relevant: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_110-127_crim.html
- Go v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 101837, February 11, 1992, main decision, preserved preliminary-investigation objection and qualified relief: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1992/feb1992/gr_101837_1992.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.