Practice question
A complaint has strong proof of identity but only a plan to obtain an essential element’s missing evidence after filing. The prosecutor treats future case build-up as evidence already at hand. Which is correct?
- A future subpoena is already proof of its expected contents
- The promised future evidence cannot fill the present evidentiary gap
- Identity alone establishes every offense element
- Filing necessarily creates missing evidence
- A strong suspicion waives the elements
Legal references
- DOJ Department Circular 015 (2024), Sections2–7,10,15–16,19–20; primary issuance text reproduced at https://comanialaw.com/doj-department-circular-no-015-series-of-2024/
- Meking v. Remulla, G.R.280455, November11,2025, main ruling: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2025/nov2025/gr_280455_2025.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.