Philippine Bar review · Topic

Nature

Explore Nature in Determination by the Prosecutor for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. What is the nature of the prosecutor’s preliminary-investigation function as recognized in Meking?
  2. Does an adverse preliminary-investigation resolution itself finally convict the respondent?
  3. What does the current framework screen for before an information is filed?
  4. A prosecutor evaluates both the complaint evidence and the counter-affidavit. The complainant objects that the screenin…
  5. An official says the DOJ may prescribe screening rules only by dictating how judges must decide trial evidence. Is that…
  6. A respondent argues that the phrase reasonable certainty of conviction means a prosecutor has already adjudged guilt an…
  7. A complainant demands automatic indictment because an accusation is sworn. The prosecutor identifies a missing element …
  8. Explain why preliminary investigation remains executive despite assessment of evidence and legal elements.
  9. Distinguish a current charging determination from proof beyond reasonable doubt at trial.
  10. Why does Meking uphold DOJ rules without surrendering the Supreme Court’s rulemaking power?
  11. Which institution itself decreed the repeal of Rule112 provisions inconsistent with the 2024 DOJ-NPS Rules?
  12. Do the 2024 DOJ-NPS Rules automatically govern every preliminary investigation by the Ombudsman merely because it is in…