Practice question
A petitioner calls an ordinary disputed credibility assessment unconstitutional but identifies no actual right impaired, arbitrary conduct or applicable procedural basis. It insists its wording automatically defeats non-interference. Which is best?
- Using the word unconstitutional guarantees relief
- The label alone does not establish the exceptional basis for judicial intervention
- Every credibility choice is automatically void
- The court may never examine even a supported claim
- The petitioner may privately order the prosecutor to reverse
Legal references
- Meking v. Remulla; AM24-02-09-SC: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/69517
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.