Philippine Bar review · Topic

Pre-trial Agreement

Explore Pre-trial Agreement in Pre-trial (Rule 118) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Under Rule118 Section2, what form must a criminal pre-trial agreement or admission take before it may be used against t…
  2. Must Rule118 Section1 agreements also receive court approval?
  3. Is an admission of a particular fact at pre-trial necessarily identical to a guilty plea to the whole offense?
  4. Defense counsel orally agrees to a material fact, but the accused never signs a written pre-trial admission. May it aut…
  5. The accused and counsel sign a written stipulation only as to identity of a document. The prosecutor argues it also adm…
  6. At pre-trial the parties negotiate several proposed admissions. The court’s unsigned draft lists them, but the accused …
  7. A written pre-trial admission bears the accused’s signature but no counsel signature. The prosecutor says the judge’s a…
  8. Explain the safeguards for using criminal pre-trial admissions against the accused.
  9. Distinguish a limited factual stipulation from an admission of guilt.
  10. Why should proposed pre-trial terms be distinguished from a final signed agreement?
  11. Does Rule118 list waiver of evidentiary admissibility objections as a pre-trial subject?
  12. Can criminal pre-trial agreements concern the civil aspects of the case as well as criminal issues?