Philippine Bar review · Topic
Double Jeopardy
Explore Double Jeopardy in Motion to Quash (Rule 117) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Which combination is necessary for the ordinary former-jeopardy bar under Rule 117 section 7?
- Besides the same offense, what does section 7 generally include in the protection after valid termination of first jeop…
- A charge is dismissed before the accused is ever arraigned or enters a plea. Assuming no distinct legal bar, does that …
- After a valid trial and acquittal, the State finds an additional witness and seeks a second ordinary prosecution for th…
- After conviction for injuries, a genuinely graver offense develops from supervening facts arising from the same act. Do…
- A defendant invokes an acquittal in a prior case to bar a second charge merely because both arose during one encounter.…
- After an acquittal, the prosecution uses Rule 65 and alleges only that the trial court misunderstood incriminating test…
- State the requisites for the ordinary double-jeopardy bar and the relationship the later charge must bear to the first.
- Explain the Rule 117 section 7 exceptions allowing prosecution for a graver necessarily inclusive offense after the for…
- Distinguish an impermissible merits challenge to a valid acquittal from the strict jurisdictional exception discussed i…
- When the same act is punished by both a law and an ordinance, what does ArticleIII Section21 say about conviction or ac…
- Under Rule117 Section7’s graver-offense exceptions, is prior satisfaction or service of the judgment ignored upon convi…