Philippine Bar review · Topic

Cancellation and Forfeiture

Explore Cancellation and Forfeiture in Bail (Rule 114) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. After the required nonappearance, what period does Section21 give bondsmen to produce the principal and show cause agai…
  2. Is declaration of forfeiture necessarily the same act as final judgment against the bondsmen?
  3. Does cancellation under Section22 automatically erase any liability already incurred on the bond?
  4. Bondsmen are duly notified to produce the accused, who fails to appear as required. May the court skip the thirty-day S…
  5. After the accused’s surrender, the bondsmen apply for cancellation with due notice to the prosecutor. Is this a recogni…
  6. During the thirty-day period, the bondsmen merely say that the accused is difficult to locate and offer nothing address…
  7. The accused is acquitted after an earlier bond breach generated a liability dispute. The surety argues automatic cancel…
  8. Describe the Section21 forfeiture sequence.
  9. Distinguish cancellation of bail from discharge of prior bond liability.
  10. Explain the two matters bondsmen must address during the thirty-day period.
  11. Under Rule 114, Section 21, what form of liability does a proper bond judgment impose on the bondsmen?
  12. Apart from surrender, what fact supports an application by bondsmen for cancellation under Section 22 with due notice t…