Philippine Bar review · Topic
Cancellation and Forfeiture
Explore Cancellation and Forfeiture in Bail (Rule 114) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- After the required nonappearance, what period does Section21 give bondsmen to produce the principal and show cause agai…
- Is declaration of forfeiture necessarily the same act as final judgment against the bondsmen?
- Does cancellation under Section22 automatically erase any liability already incurred on the bond?
- Bondsmen are duly notified to produce the accused, who fails to appear as required. May the court skip the thirty-day S…
- After the accused’s surrender, the bondsmen apply for cancellation with due notice to the prosecutor. Is this a recogni…
- During the thirty-day period, the bondsmen merely say that the accused is difficult to locate and offer nothing address…
- The accused is acquitted after an earlier bond breach generated a liability dispute. The surety argues automatic cancel…
- Describe the Section21 forfeiture sequence.
- Distinguish cancellation of bail from discharge of prior bond liability.
- Explain the two matters bondsmen must address during the thirty-day period.
- Under Rule 114, Section 21, what form of liability does a proper bond judgment impose on the bondsmen?
- Apart from surrender, what fact supports an application by bondsmen for cancellation under Section 22 with due notice t…