Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Warrantless Arrest, When Lawful

Multiple Choice Easy

Practice question

Does the hot-pursuit ground invariably require the arresting officer personally to have seen the crime being committed?
  1. No.
  2. Yes, personal eyewitness status is always indispensable.
  3. Yes, even immediately observed fresh injuries cannot be considered.
  4. Yes, the rule is identical in every respect to in flagrante arrest.
  5. Yes, a victim may never identify the perpetrator.

Legal references

  • Rules of Court, Rule 113, Sections 2-9, and Rule 114, Section 26, as relevant: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_110-127_crim.html
  • Pestilos v. Generoso, G.R. No. 182601, November 10, 2014, MAIN decision (not separate opinion), facts gathered promptly after assault and hot-pursuit arrest: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2014/nov2014/gr_182601_2014.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.