Philippine Bar review · Topic

Waiver of Objections to Irregularity

Explore Waiver of Objections to Irregularity in Arrest (Rule 113) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Under Rule 114 section 26, when must an accused raise the covered objection to the legality of arrest to preserve it de…
  2. Does applying for or being admitted to bail automatically bar a timely pre-plea challenge to arrest under section 26?
  3. What does waiver of an irregular arrest ordinarily concern under Patotoy?
  4. An accused posts bail and, before plea, properly challenges an allegedly unlawful warrant. May the court reject the cha…
  5. An accused pleads without raising any proper objection to the manner of acquiring jurisdiction over his person, then at…
  6. After pleading without an arrest objection, an accused timely objects at trial that drugs were obtained through an unco…
  7. An accused appears solely to contest jurisdiction over his person through a proper motion attacking the arrest warrant.…
  8. Explain how Rule 114 section 26 reconciles seeking bail with objections to arrest or preliminary investigation.
  9. State the distinction drawn in Patotoy between waiver of an arrest objection and admissibility of seized evidence.
  10. Distinguish an ordinary voluntary appearance seeking affirmative relief from a special appearance contesting personal j…
  11. Under Rule114 Section26, by what latest stage must the court resolve the covered timely objection?
  12. Besides arrest and warrant objections, what investigative defect is expressly covered by Rule114 Section26?