Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Suspension of Arraignment

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

The sixty-day period from filing the review petition has expired. No other lawful suspension ground or restraining order is present. May the accused insist that this review alone indefinitely bars arraignment?
  1. Yes, the sixty-day limit is merely optional.
  2. Yes, every unanswered petition stops court action forever.
  3. No; the review-related ground does not supply indefinite suspension beyond the stated maximum.
  4. Yes, if the accused repeats the same motion.
  5. No; the court must automatically convict without arraignment.

Legal references

  • https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_110-127_crim.html — Rule 116 section 11: grounds and limits of suspension; Rule 111 sections 6–7: qualifying prejudicial question.
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2018/sep2018/gr_186403_2018.html — Corpus v. Pamular, G.R. 186403, September 5, 2018, main opinion: 60-day limit and arrest-warrant distinction.

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.