Philippine Bar review · Topic
Searching Inquiry
Explore Searching Inquiry in Arraignment and Plea (Rule 116) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Under Rule 116, Section 3, what are the two central subjects of a searching inquiry into a guilty plea to a capital off…
- In what language should the judge's searching-inquiry questions be posed?
- Why should a searching inquiry examine the accused's age, educational background, and socioeconomic circumstances?
- A judge asks only, 'You know you may go to prison, correct?' and receives 'Yes.' The judge neither explains the offense…
- The accused says he pleaded guilty because an investigator promised immediate release in exchange. What should the sear…
- In a murder case, defense counsel says, 'I have discussed everything with my client.' The judge asks counsel no further…
- An accused with limited schooling answers 'guilty' after the charge is read. During questioning he explains that he bel…
- Identify the principal matters a judge should explore in a searching inquiry under People v. Pagal.
- Explain why a searching inquiry cannot be reduced to asking whether an accused expects imprisonment.
- Does defense counsel's presence remove the judge's searching-inquiry duty for a guilty plea governed by Rule 116, Secti…
- In a proceeding governed by Rule116 Section3, does a satisfactory searching inquiry eliminate the prosecution’s duty to…
- May the accused present evidence on his own behalf in the Section3 proceeding?