Philippine Bar review · Topic
Improvident Plea
Explore Improvident Plea in Arraignment and Plea (Rule 116) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Until what point may the court permit withdrawal of an improvident guilty plea under Rule 116 section 5?
- What plea replaces the improvident guilty plea when withdrawal is permitted under section 5?
- What does Rule 116 section 1(d) require when an accused pleads guilty but presents exculpatory evidence?
- Before a conviction becomes final, an accused shows that his guilty plea resulted from failure to understand its conseq…
- A counsel de oficio is appointed immediately before arraignment. May the court deny all consultation on the theory that…
- On appeal, an accused establishes an irregular guilty plea but the record also contains independently received evidence…
- A conviction rests solely on an improvident guilty plea. Despite repeated opportunities in a fair proceeding, the prose…
- State the rule on withdrawal of an improvident plea of guilty and distinguish withdrawal from acquittal.
- Explain two arraignment safeguards that help prevent an improvident plea, and the response to exculpatory evidence afte…
- Why does an improvident guilty plea not invariably dictate the same appellate remedy?
- Who must personally enter the accused’s plea under Rule116 Section1(b)?
- In what language must the information be read at arraignment under Section1(a)?