Practice question
A private complainant alone appeals an RTC dismissal to the CA solely to reinstate the criminal prosecution. The State through the OSG does not conform, and no applicable exceptional basis or civil-only interest is invoked. The complainant says Rule 122's 'any party' gives unrestricted standing. Under the 2026 Sebastian main decision, which is sound?
- The phrase gives every witness an unrestricted criminal appeal
- The complainant automatically replaces the People
- No distinction exists between criminal and civil aspects
- The stated criminal-aspect appeal cannot rely on unrestricted private standing; State conformity and the governing limits matter
- The complainant may therefore convict the accused privately
Legal references
- https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_110-127_crim.html — Rules 120 §§4–6, 121 §§1–6, 122 §§1–3,6,11, and 126 §§1,3–5; read appellate periods with Rodriguez and current appellate routes.
- https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2012/oct2012/gr_192799_2012.html — Rodriguez v. People, G.R. No. 192799, October 24, 2012, MAIN resolution (fresh fifteen-day criminal appeal period after timely reconsideration).
- https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/70443 — Philippine Investment Two (SPV-AMC), Inc. v. Sebastian, G.R. Nos. 238729-30, April 8, 2026, EN BANC MAIN decision (independent assessment on withdrawal and prior arrest probable-cause finding).
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.