Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Venue (Rule 4)

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

A nonresident is not found in the Philippines. A properly framed action concerns that defendant’s interest in Philippine property in Province R; the plaintiff resides in City S. No special rule or exclusive stipulation governs. Which Rule 4 section 3 venue statement is correct?
  1. Only the foreign country is permitted under every circumstance
  2. Only the place where the defendant was born is permitted
  3. The action must always be filed directly in the Supreme Court
  4. The Philippine venue provision itself eliminates all service requirements
  5. The rule permits the place where the plaintiff resides or where the property or a portion is situated or found, with jurisdiction and service separately satisfied

Legal references

  • https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-10-20-sc_2019.html — Rule 4 sections 1–4, real and personal actions, nonresidents and exceptions; Rule 8 section 12, timely venue defense.
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1969/oct1969/gr_l-27033_1969.html — Polytrade Corp. v. Blanco, G.R. No. L-27033, October 31, 1969, permissive versus exclusive venue stipulation; current procedural requirements read from amended Rules.

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.