Practice question
A defendant seeks and obtains affirmative relief without preserving a personal-jurisdiction objection, then first uses the words special appearance after an unfavorable development. Which claim fails?
- That the actual filings should be examined.
- That the governing current rules remain relevant.
- That personal jurisdiction and merits are distinct inquiries.
- That counsel must identify the precise conduct relied on.
- That the later label alone necessarily negates the earlier unreserved submission.
Legal references
- Spouses Abayon v. Bank of the Philippine Islands, G.R. No. 249684, March 29, 2023, main decision, unreserved affirmative relief and voluntary submission; no historical motion-to-dismiss mechanics relied on: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2023/mar2023/gr_249684_2023.html
- 2019 Amendments to Civil Procedure, Rules 8, 11, 14 Section 23 and 15, as relevant to each stated issue: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-10-20-sc_2019.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.