Practice question
A court properly authorizes email service on a qualifying foreign entity under the applicable framework. The sender produces only a printout saying message sent, with no copy of the summons as served or mailing affidavit. No other proof is supplied. Which Section21 deficiency remains?
- The stated summons copy and affidavit components of electronic-service proof are missing
- Court permission automatically proves actual service
- A printout alone invariably supplies every component
- The foreign company must create the sender’s affidavit
- The original complaint’s fee receipt replaces service proof
Legal references
- Current Rule14 relevant Sections5–6,11–12,14–16 and19–23: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-10-20-sc_2019.html Foreign entity overseas methods and electronic proof; applicable conventions remain controlling.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.