Practice question
A server loses the original before service and privately prepares a replacement without obtaining court-issued alias process. The plaintiff argues that the original court seal can be described in the return instead of obtained. No other valid process exists. Which is correct?
- The Section4 court-issuance mechanism has not been followed
- A description of a seal creates official process
- Any private replacement binds the defendant
- The courier may issue judicial process
- The defendant’s silence authorizes forgery
Legal references
- Current Rule14, AM19-10-20-SC: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-10-20-sc_2019.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.