Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Purpose in Relation to Actions In Personam, In Rem, and Quasi In Rem

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

A corporation filed the complaint. A counterclaim also impleads two officers personally, neither previously a party nor voluntarily appearing. The corporation argues that its own submission necessarily establishes personal jurisdiction over both officers. Which is correct?
  1. Lafarge distinguishes the corporation’s existing submission from the newly joined individuals’ required process.
  2. Corporate filing automatically submits every officer personally.
  3. All officers are always the same person as the corporation.
  4. A counterclaim creates jurisdiction without any process or submission.
  5. The officers become judgment debtors merely because they are named.

Legal references

  • 2019 Amendments to Civil Procedure, Rule 14, particularly Sections 1-5, 8, 13 and 23, as applicable to the stated issue: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-10-20-sc_2019.html
  • Francisco Motors Corp. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 100812, June 25, 1999, main decision, original plaintiff and counterclaim summons; no historical answer period relied on: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1999/jun1999/gr_100812_1999.html
  • Lafarge Cement Philippines, Inc. v. Continental Cement Corp., G.R. No. 155173, November 23, 2004, main decision, summons on newly impleaded counterclaim defendants: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2004/nov2004/gr_155173_2004.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.