Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Purpose in Relation to Actions In Personam, In Rem, and Quasi In Rem

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

A complaint asks the court to order a defendant personally to pay damages for injuries caused by the defendant's conduct. No attachment or property-directed relief changes the action's character. Which classification best explains the need for personal jurisdiction?
  1. It is necessarily in rem because damages have monetary value.
  2. It is always quasi in rem because every defendant owns property.
  3. It is an administrative proceeding.
  4. It is in personam because it seeks to impose personal liability.
  5. It cannot be classified until the defendant admits liability.

Legal references

  • https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-10-20-sc_2019.html — AM19-10-20-SC, 2019 amendments, Rule14 §§1–5,13,20–23.
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2023/apr2023/gr_206005_2023.html — SAGING v Standard Fruit, GR206005, April12 2023, main decision.
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2023/jul2023/gr_209449_2023.html — Republic v NCIP, GR209449, July11 2023, en banc main decision (notice and jurisdiction over the res).

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.