Practice question
A court receives the required initiatory pleading and fee proof. It identifies only alleged prematurity, not a facial Rule 9 ground, and treats that label alone as authority to bypass the issuance-direction requirement. What does Agullo require counsel to distinguish?
- Ordinary prematurity from the enumerated Rule 9 grounds referenced by Rule 14 Section 1.
- Every ordinary defense is automatically a Rule 9 facial-dismissal ground.
- The plaintiff’s lawyer may issue summons if the court delays.
- Prematurity necessarily means missing subject-matter jurisdiction.
- A court may replace all issuance rules with the defendant’s approval.
Legal references
- 2019 Amendments to Civil Procedure, Rule 14, particularly Sections 1-5, 8, 13 and 23, as applicable to the stated issue: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-10-20-sc_2019.html
- Spouses Agullo v. Victa-Espinosa, G.R. No. 269921, April 22, 2025, en banc main decision, prematurity not a Rule 9 motu proprio ground: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2025/apr2025/gr_269921_2025.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.