Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Subpoena (Rule 21)

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

A witness resides 150 kilometers from the place of testimony by the ordinary course of travel. Counsel invokes Rule21 §10 to argue that §§8 and9's arrest-to-compel-attendance and contempt provisions do not apply. Another lawyer claims §10 instead makes every subpoena or document request to that person universally void. Which is correct?
  1. The first argument identifies the text's limited exception; the Rule expressly excepts §§8 and9 rather than declaring every subpoena universally void.
  2. Every subpoena to a distant witness is void for every purpose.
  3. The exception is measured only by straight-line aerial distance.
  4. The exception applies only if the witness lives abroad.
  5. The exception makes deposition-use rules identical to subpoena-compulsion rules.

Legal references

  • https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-10-20-sc_2019.html — AM19-10-20-SC, current 2019 amendments, Rules18–22.
  • https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_1-71_civil.html — retained provisions of Rules19–22, read with 2019 amendments.

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.