Practice question
During family mediation, credible evidence of coercion and danger emerges. A participant insists the mediator must continue until a settlement is signed, even if safety is threatened. Which action is recognized by the rule?
- The mediator must ignore the danger.
- The mediator must force a signature.
- The mediator may recommend suspension or termination under Section 9.
- The mediator must publicly shame the vulnerable participant.
- The danger automatically proves the underlying case's merits.
Legal references
- https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/11/98364 — A.M. 24-02-06-SC, Rule on Family Mediation, Sections 9 and 21–22.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.