Practice question
A court denies reconsideration of its final judgment. The challenger establishes a concrete allegation potentially amounting to jurisdictional grave abuse and also addresses why no plain, speedy and adequate remedy exists. The opponent says Rule37 Section9 makes Rule65 impossible under every conceivable fact. Which is best?
- Every denial automatically qualifies for certiorari
- Rule37 erases Rule65 entirely
- Allegation alone guarantees success
- The ordinary appeal rule remains, but a genuinely proper Rule65 case must be assessed under its independent stringent requirements
- The challenger may ignore every filing requirement
Legal references
- Rule37 Section9; Rule65 Section1: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_1-71_civil.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.