Practice question
A lawyer has an RTC appellate decision for Rule42 and a judgment eligible for Rule45 review. She assumes both automatically permit the same thirty-day extension without payment or timely motion. Which comparison is correct?
- Their extension ceilings and conditions are distinct, and neither assumption supplies a compliant request
- Both automatically give thirty days
- Neither rule contains any extension procedure
- Party consent replaces both rules
- A single late motion extends every case
Legal references
- Rules of Court, specified Rules42–47: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_1-71_civil.html Rules42 Section1,43 Section4,45 Section2 and52 Section1.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.