Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Appeal from Quasi-judicial Agencies to CA (Rule 43)

Multiple Choice Easy

Practice question

What kinds of questions may an appeal properly brought under Rule 43 raise?
  1. Only hearing-room locations
  2. Only fact and never law
  3. Questions of fact, law or mixed fact and law
  4. Only law, with no qualification allowing factual issues
  5. Only the parties’ preferred result without assigned error

Legal references

  • https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_1-71_civil.html — Rule 43 sections 1–5, 10 and 12, quasi-judicial functions, scope, period, one reconsideration motion, substantial evidence and nonautomatic stay; read with later special statutes.
  • https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2004/ra_9282_2004.html — amended CTA charter section 7(a)(5), CBAA appellate decisions, and section 19, Supreme Court Rule 45 review of CTA en banc.
  • https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2008/ra_9503_2008.html — CTA’s current collegiate-court rank and structure.
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1998/sep1998/gr_130866_1998.html — St. Martin Funeral Home v. NLRC, G.R. No. 130866, September 16, 1998, main decision on CA Rule 65 review of NLRC action.

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.