Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Issues Cognizable

Multiple Choice Medium Jurisprudence

Practice question

An appellant asks a reviewing court to decide which of two witnesses told the truth by reassessing demeanor and the probative weight of conflicting testimony. What kind of question is ordinarily raised?
  1. Pure law merely because counsel says so.
  2. A matter of docket fees only.
  3. No issue of any kind.
  4. A question of fact.
  5. An automatic constitutional question.

Legal references

  • https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/2019-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf — Supreme Court official current2019 Rules40–41 text.
  • https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_1-71_civil.html — Rules40–45,51§8,64§3 (read with 2019 amendments).
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2022/jul2022/gr_243163_2022.html — International Exchange Bank v Lee, GR243163, July4 2022, main decision.
  • https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/68062 — Lagamayo v Cullinan Group, GR227718, November11 2021, main decision (Rule51§8 exceptions).

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.