Philippine Bar review · Topic

Kinds (Rule 6)

Explore Kinds (Rule 6) in Pleadings for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer flashcards.

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Which pleading alleges the plaintiff’s or claiming party’s cause or causes of action under Rule 6?
  2. A claim by one defendant against a co-defendant arising from the transaction that is the subject of the original action…
  3. Under current Rule 6, when may a plaintiff file a reply to an answer?
  4. The defendant admits the alleged loan for purposes of the defense but alleges it was fully paid, so recovery is barred.…
  5. A defendant seeks indemnity from an insurer not yet a party, in respect of the plaintiff’s claim against him. Under Rul…
  6. In a valid original RTC action, the defendant has a transaction-connected counterclaim cognizable by the regular courts…
  7. An answer contains new matters but attaches no actionable document. The plaintiff wants both to dispute those matters a…
  8. Distinguish a counterclaim, a cross-claim and a third-party complaint by the opposing party and the required relationsh…
  9. Explain the current reply rule when an answer contains new matters, first without an actionable document and then with …
  10. A proposed third-party complaint seeks relief on a controversy wholly extraneous to the opponent’s claim and would intr…
  11. May a counterclaim be asserted against an original counterclaimant under Rule6 Section9?
  12. May a cross-claim be filed against an original cross-claimant under Rule6 Section9?