Philippine Bar review · Topic
Kinds (Rule 6)
Explore Kinds (Rule 6) in Pleadings for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer flashcards.
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Which pleading alleges the plaintiff’s or claiming party’s cause or causes of action under Rule 6?
- A claim by one defendant against a co-defendant arising from the transaction that is the subject of the original action…
- Under current Rule 6, when may a plaintiff file a reply to an answer?
- The defendant admits the alleged loan for purposes of the defense but alleges it was fully paid, so recovery is barred.…
- A defendant seeks indemnity from an insurer not yet a party, in respect of the plaintiff’s claim against him. Under Rul…
- In a valid original RTC action, the defendant has a transaction-connected counterclaim cognizable by the regular courts…
- An answer contains new matters but attaches no actionable document. The plaintiff wants both to dispute those matters a…
- Distinguish a counterclaim, a cross-claim and a third-party complaint by the opposing party and the required relationsh…
- Explain the current reply rule when an answer contains new matters, first without an actionable document and then with …
- A proposed third-party complaint seeks relief on a controversy wholly extraneous to the opponent’s claim and would intr…
- May a counterclaim be asserted against an original counterclaimant under Rule6 Section9?
- May a cross-claim be filed against an original cross-claimant under Rule6 Section9?