Practice question
After a valid amendment, a pleader claims every prior admission has become impossible to use because the former pleading was superseded. The adversary instead claims the old admission remains automatically conclusive as a current judicial admission. Which is best under Section8?
- Both positions are necessarily correct
- Prior statements are erased from history
- Supersession prevents every evidentiary use
- Prior admissions may be offered in evidence against the pleader; supersession does not itself establish either claimed absolute effect
- The amended pleading is automatically void
Legal references
- AM19-10-20-SC Rule10 Section8: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-10-20-sc_2019.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.