Philippine Bar review · Topic
Litigious and Non-litigious Motions
Page 2 of practice questions on Litigious and Non-litigious Motions in Motions (Rule 15). Browse published questions and explore related topics for Philippine…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Is a motion for an order to break in or for a writ of demolition expressly listed as litigious?
- A party seeks cancellation of a statutory lien and labels it non-litigious merely because no oral testimony is requeste…
- An applicant seeks an order directing the sheriff to execute the final certificate of sale, assuming all substantive pr…
- A written motion is properly classified as non-litigious. The movant argues that this classification eliminates every p…
- A party moves to amend after a responsive pleading has been filed but calls the request non-litigious because the propo…
- Classify an intervention motion and an order-to-demolish motion under current Rule 15.
- Explain why a non-litigious motion still requires attention to service.
- Distinguish an alias writ of execution from a motion to cancel a statutory lien for Rule 15 classification.