Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Intervention (Rule 19)

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

A would-be buyer has only a hope of negotiating a purchase next year and no existing right affected by the judgment. He claims every potential future commercial opportunity is sufficient legal interest for intervention. Which distinction matters?
  1. A merely speculative future opportunity is different from the required direct legal interest
  2. Every commercial hope is automatically enough
  3. Friendship with a party is conclusive
  4. The applicant may manufacture legal interest by preference
  5. Any possible profit requires admission

Legal references

  • 2019 Civil Procedure Amendments relevant Rules19–22: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-10-20-sc_2019.html
  • Rules of Court retained relevant Rules19–22: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_1-71_civil.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.