Practice question
Does the mere existence of a transferee’s claim automatically make that transferee indispensable in the limited revival action?
- No; Land Bank distinguishes that claim from the revival inquiry
- Yes; every later holder must always be joined
- Yes; any nonparty can veto revival
- Yes; transfers erase finality
- Yes; a new shareholder replaces the judgment debtor automatically
Legal references
- Rules of Court Rule39 relevant sections: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_1-71_civil.html Section6.
- Land Bank v Suntay GR268116 January14,2025 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2025/jan2025/gr_268116_2025.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.