Practice question
A timely revival complaint meets the three stated requirements. The RTC orders joinder of later shareholders solely because they acquired disputed shares, then dismisses when the limitation period expires before joinder. The case materially matches Land Bank’s limited revival issue. Which holding matters?
- The improper indispensable-party premise cannot support that prescription dismissal
- Every later transferee was necessarily indispensable
- The timely complaint becomes late merely because the court ordered irrelevant joinder
- The creditor must retry the original title controversy
- A shareholder’s objection conclusively extinguishes the judgment
Legal references
- Rules of Court Rule39 relevant sections: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_1-71_civil.html Section6.
- Land Bank v Suntay GR268116 January14,2025 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2025/jan2025/gr_268116_2025.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.