Practice question
A debtor says revival is impossible unless the creditor first proves that the judgment remains enforceable by and against every original party in precisely the same circumstances. Which Land Bank statement answers?
- The rule does not add that proposed proof requirement to the identified revival elements
- Every original circumstance must remain unchanged
- Any changed shareholder destroys jurisdiction
- Every original witness must testify again
- Revival requires the original judge’s personal consent
Legal references
- Rules of Court Rule39 relevant sections: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_1-71_civil.html Section6.
- Land Bank v Suntay GR268116 January14,2025 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2025/jan2025/gr_268116_2025.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.