Practice question
A properly certified foreign judgment is offered. The opponent proves a Section48 lack-of-notice defect. Creditor argues the record certificate makes that defense legally impossible. Which is correct?
- Authentication does not eliminate the express notice defense
- A certificate always proves every party was heard
- Every foreign judgment is immune from notice inquiry
- The seal replaces all due process
- Only the judgment amount matters
Legal references
- Rule39 Sections16,26,47–48: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_1-71_civil.html
- 2019 Evidence Rules132 Sections24–25 and33: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-08-15-sc_2019.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.