Practice question
A foreign-record copy’s attestation omits any statement that it is a correct copy of the original or specified part. No applicable exemption or other proof exists. Counsel invokes Section25 but says the attestation’s title alone suffices. Which is correct?
- Any title supplies all missing substance
- Section25 requires the substantive correct-copy attestation
- A private summary always is a judicial record
- The debtor must authenticate for the creditor
- Only the paper size matters
Legal references
- Rule39 Sections16,26,47–48: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_1-71_civil.html
- 2019 Evidence Rules132 Sections24–25 and33: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-08-15-sc_2019.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.