Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Dismissal with Prejudice vs. without Prejudice

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

A Section3 plaintiff-fault dismissal says nothing declaring a different effect. The plaintiff assumes it is without prejudice solely because it did not hear witnesses on the substantive claim. Which is best?
  1. A merits effect always requires full trial testimony
  2. All procedural dismissals permit unlimited refiling
  3. The plaintiff alone chooses the effect afterward
  4. The default is always Section2’s rule
  5. Section3 expressly gives merits effect unless the court declares otherwise

Legal references

  • Rule17 Section3: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-10-20-sc_2019.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.