Philippine Bar review · Topic
Dismissal Due to Fault of Plaintiff
Explore Dismissal Due to Fault of Plaintiff in Dismissal (Rule 17) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Rule17 Section3’s failure-to-appear ground specifically refers to which stage?
- Who may initiate a Section3 dismissal on the stated plaintiff-fault grounds?
- What is Section3’s ordinary effect unless the court declares otherwise?
- Without justifiable cause, a plaintiff leaves its action unprosecuted for an unreasonable length of time. The defendant…
- A plaintiff has no justifiable reason for refusing to comply with a lawful court order in the case. Counsel argues Sect…
- A plaintiff cannot attend its evidence-in-chief date because of an established serious emergency and promptly supplies …
- A court dismisses the complaint under Section3 for proved unjustified fault, expressly declaring the dismissal without …
- Identify Section3’s main plaintiff-fault grounds without confusing them with Rule18 pre-trial sanctions.
- Explain the significance of no justifiable cause and unreasonable length of time under Section3.
- State the ordinary prejudice effect of a Section3 dismissal and what happens to a counterclaim.
- Does Section3 expressly include unjustified noncompliance with the Rules, independently of noncompliance with a court o…
- Does Section3 say a complaint may be dismissed, rather than that every alleged lapse automatically dismisses it?