Philippine Bar review · Topic

Dismissal Due to Fault of Plaintiff

Explore Dismissal Due to Fault of Plaintiff in Dismissal (Rule 17) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Rule17 Section3’s failure-to-appear ground specifically refers to which stage?
  2. Who may initiate a Section3 dismissal on the stated plaintiff-fault grounds?
  3. What is Section3’s ordinary effect unless the court declares otherwise?
  4. Without justifiable cause, a plaintiff leaves its action unprosecuted for an unreasonable length of time. The defendant…
  5. A plaintiff has no justifiable reason for refusing to comply with a lawful court order in the case. Counsel argues Sect…
  6. A plaintiff cannot attend its evidence-in-chief date because of an established serious emergency and promptly supplies …
  7. A court dismisses the complaint under Section3 for proved unjustified fault, expressly declaring the dismissal without …
  8. Identify Section3’s main plaintiff-fault grounds without confusing them with Rule18 pre-trial sanctions.
  9. Explain the significance of no justifiable cause and unreasonable length of time under Section3.
  10. State the ordinary prejudice effect of a Section3 dismissal and what happens to a counterclaim.
  11. Does Section3 expressly include unjustified noncompliance with the Rules, independently of noncompliance with a court o…
  12. Does Section3 say a complaint may be dismissed, rather than that every alleged lapse automatically dismisses it?