Practice question
The Secretary-General concludes that an expert’s immunity would impede justice and can be waived without prejudice to UN interests. The expert claims a personal veto because the privilege belongs exclusively to him. Which is best?
- Section 23 gives the Secretary-General the right and duty to waive on those conditions
- The expert has an unlimited personal veto under the text
- Every expert can permanently amend the Convention
- A private employment agreement always defeats waiver
- Only the complainant may determine UN interests
Legal references
- Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/36/12697; Sections 22-23,29.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.