Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: War Crimes, Genocide, and Crimes Against Humanity

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

A prosecutor alleges a section 6 killing as part of a systematic civilian attack, with the accused's knowledge, but proves no armed conflict. The defense says crimes against humanity invariably require war. Which response best applies RA 9851?
  1. The defense is correct because section 6 applies only to international war.
  2. The defense is correct because the title controls over the elements.
  3. The absence of war automatically establishes genocide.
  4. Only crimes on battlefields are punishable under section 6.
  5. Section 6 does not make armed conflict an indispensable element; the specified attack context and other elements must be established.

Legal references

  • Republic Act No. 9851, sections 3–6 and 10, https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2009/ra_9851_2009.html
  • Rome Statute, Articles 6–8 (genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes), https://legal.un.org/icc/statute/99_corr/cstatute.htm

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.