Philippine Bar review · Topic

Military Necessity

Explore Military Necessity in Fundamental Principles for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Does military necessity generally authorize conduct expressly prohibited by applicable international humanitarian law?
  2. Under Hague Regulations Article 23(g), destruction or seizure of enemy property is prohibited unless what condition is …
  3. What does AP I Article 35(1) state about the choice of methods or means of warfare?
  4. A commander proposes destroying enemy property solely to punish its civilian owner, with no imperative military necessi…
  5. An AP I-governed party accepts that a proposed method is of a nature to cause superfluous injury or unnecessary sufferi…
  6. A reviewer concludes that a proposed action serves a genuine military purpose. Another reviewer identifies an applicabl…
  7. An AP I-governed party argues that a military objective is important and an attack necessary. The stipulated assessment…
  8. Explain why military necessity is not a general defense to every violation of IHL.
  9. Explain the necessity qualification in Hague Regulations Article 23(g), using the distinction between imperative necess…
  10. A student treats military necessity, distinction, and proportionality as interchangeable. Explain the relevant differen…
  11. Under Geneva ConventionIV Article53, what is the stated exception to the Occupying Power’s property-destruction prohibi…
  12. Does Geneva ConventionIV Article53 protect only individually owned private real property?