Philippine Bar review · Topic
Military Necessity
Explore Military Necessity in Fundamental Principles for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Does military necessity generally authorize conduct expressly prohibited by applicable international humanitarian law?
- Under Hague Regulations Article 23(g), destruction or seizure of enemy property is prohibited unless what condition is …
- What does AP I Article 35(1) state about the choice of methods or means of warfare?
- A commander proposes destroying enemy property solely to punish its civilian owner, with no imperative military necessi…
- An AP I-governed party accepts that a proposed method is of a nature to cause superfluous injury or unnecessary sufferi…
- A reviewer concludes that a proposed action serves a genuine military purpose. Another reviewer identifies an applicabl…
- An AP I-governed party argues that a military objective is important and an attack necessary. The stipulated assessment…
- Explain why military necessity is not a general defense to every violation of IHL.
- Explain the necessity qualification in Hague Regulations Article 23(g), using the distinction between imperative necess…
- A student treats military necessity, distinction, and proportionality as interchangeable. Explain the relevant differen…
- Under Geneva ConventionIV Article53, what is the stated exception to the Occupying Power’s property-destruction prohibi…
- Does Geneva ConventionIV Article53 protect only individually owned private real property?