Philippine Bar review · Topic
Non-International Armed Conflict
Explore Non-International Armed Conflict in Categories of Armed Conflict for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Which provision supplies minimum protections for non-international armed conflict? Multiple Choice Easy
- Which situation does Protocol II Article 1(2) expressly exclude? Multiple Choice Easy
- Under Protocol II Article 1(1), qualifying opposing armed groups must operate under what command? Multiple Choice Easy
- Dissident forces fight the State’s armed forces under responsible command and control territory sufficiently for sustai… Multiple Choice Medium
- A conflict qualifies under common Article 3 but the armed group lacks Protocol II’s required territorial control. Does … Multiple Choice Medium
- In a conflict concededly covered by common Article 3, a government denies humane treatment to captives because it has n… Multiple Choice Hard
- Two organized non-State groups fight in a conflict stipulated to satisfy common Article 3. State armed forces do not pa… Multiple Choice Hard
- Compare the scope of common Article 3 and Protocol II. Essay Medium
- Explain Protocol II’s exclusion of riots and sporadic violence. Does exclusion create a legal vacuum? Essay Medium
- May a party withhold common Article 3 protections because applying them would supposedly recognize its opponent’s polit… Essay Medium
- Under Protocol II Article 3, may the Protocol itself be invoked to affect State sovereignty? Multiple Choice Easy
- Does Article 3 authorize using Protocol II as justification for foreign intervention in the covered conflict? Multiple Choice Easy