Philippine Bar review · Topic

No-Harm Principle

Page 2 of practice questions on No-Harm Principle in Rio Declaration (1992). Browse published questions and explore related topics for Philippine Bar review.

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Does paragraph 205 contemplate continuing monitoring after operations start where necessary?
  2. An industrial project creates a risk of significant adverse impact on a shared river. Officials say an EIA is irrelevan…
  3. A project has a completed prior EIA. New operational information makes continuing monitoring necessary. Officials say t…
  4. A State selects the specific content of an EIA under its domestic authorization process but ignores the project’s natur…
  5. A proposed plant risks significant adverse impact on another State’s environment. Its owner offers to finance compensat…
  6. Explain how prior EIA supports the preventive no-harm obligation in Pulp Mills.
  7. Does national determination of an EIA’s specific content mean the State may ignore the project’s environmental characte…
  8. Explain why a prior EIA may not end every environmental vigilance obligation for the project’s entire life.