Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: No-Harm Principle

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

An activity under State A's control is alleged to damage the environment in an area beyond every State's national jurisdiction. A says Rio Principle 2 is irrelevant unless a neighboring State proves ownership of that area. Which answer is best?
  1. Correct; the principle protects only privately owned foreign land.
  2. Correct; areas beyond national jurisdiction are expressly excluded.
  3. Correct; only a shared land border matters.
  4. Incorrect; every allegation automatically proves all compensation claims.
  5. Incorrect; the principle expressly includes areas beyond national jurisdiction, although any specific legal claim still requires its applicable basis and proof.

Legal references

  • Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (1992), Principle 2, https://www.un.org/esa/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm
  • Convention on Biological Diversity, Article 3, https://www.cbd.int/convention/articles/default.shtml?a=cbd-03
  • UN Audiovisual Library, Stockholm and Rio Declarations, https://legal.un.org/avl/ha/dunche/dunche.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.