Practice question
A Senate committee lawfully investigates procurement safeguards. Several executive officials refuse all attendance, stating only that their positions are 'covered by executive privilege.' No specific protected information is identified, and neither the President nor an Executive Secretary acting by presidential authority clearly asserts a privilege with its basis. Under Senate v. Ermita, which assessment is correct?
- The titles of executive officials alone establish a complete privilege.
- The committee must accept any implied claim without knowing its basis.
- The blanket refusal is insufficient because privilege concerns protected information and must be properly and specifically invoked.
- All presidential communications must always be disclosed regardless of circumstances.
- The absence of a valid claim automatically authorizes any method of coercion.
Legal references
- Senate v. Ermita, G.R. No. 169777 et al., April 20, 2006, main decision, specific assertion and authority to invoke executive privilege: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2006/apr2006/gr_169777_2006.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.