Discipline of Members

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

1. Under Santiago v. Sandiganbayan, does election to Congress categorically exclude an official from the preventive-suspen…
2. A court imposes a lawful ninety-day preventive suspension under RA 3019 on a legislator, after the required determinati…
3. A Senator argues that a pending RA 3019 prosecution can support preventive suspension only from the former agency offic…
4. A Senator faces a valid anti-graft information for acts allegedly committed before election. The court gives a fair opp…
5. A House validly disciplines a Member for disorderly behavior by imposing a suspension expressly labeled a punitive cham…
6. Compare a House’s punitive suspension for disorderly behavior with a court’s preventive suspension under RA 3019. Expla…
7. A legislator claims that preventive suspension in a valid RA 3019 prosecution requires the court first to establish gui…
8. A Representative facing a valid RA 3019 information argues that subsequent election to the Senate means a court can nev…