Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Topic

The Sandiganbayan (PD 1606, as amended)

Page 2 of practice questions on The Sandiganbayan (PD 1606, as amended) in Accountability of Public Officers (RA 6713). Browse published questions and explore…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Subject to the express exception for cases under the specified 1986 Executive Orders, who represents the People in case… Multiple Choice Easy
  2. A corresponding civil action was previously filed separately but has no judgment yet. A covered criminal case is then f… Multiple Choice Medium
  3. An RTC case falls within the specific amended PD 1606 Section 4 carve-out. The accused insists the statute always requi… Multiple Choice Medium
  4. A petitioner seeks a writ in the Sandiganbayan and cites only the words certiorari and mandamus in amended Section 4. T… Multiple Choice Hard
  5. A prosecutor applies RA 10660’s new jurisdictional amendment solely because an old case remained pending when the Act t… Multiple Choice Hard
  6. Explain the special handling of the corresponding civil action under amended PD 1606 Section 4, including an earlier se… Essay Medium
  7. A litigant invokes the Sandiganbayan’s statutory writ power in a completely unrelated dispute. Explain why the names of… Essay Medium
  8. A case was pending without trial when RA 10660 took effect, but concerns an offense committed before effectivity. Expla… Essay Medium